Opinion
November 3, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewed in the light most favorable to the People ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), the evidence was legally sufficient to support his conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).
Additionally, the defendant's sentence was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit.
O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.