Opinion
December 30, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, Heller, J., Kramer, J.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).
We have examined the arguments raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.