From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wallington

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 7, 1926
77 Cal.App. 366 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)

Opinion

Docket No. 1372.

April 7, 1926.

APPLICATION for stay of execution pending appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles S. Burnell, Judge. Application denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Max Schleimer for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the face of the application for a stay of execution of the judgment under section 1243 of the Penal Code that the appeal from the judgment is abortive and that the order made after judgment necessarily must be affirmed. The appeal from the judgment was not taken in time. (Pen. Code, sec. 1239; Starr v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.App. 670 [ 139 P. 241].) [2] The sufficiency of the indictment could not be questioned on the motion made in the lower court to set aside the judgment after it had become final. ( People v. Mooney, 178 Cal. 525 [ 174 P. 325]; People v. Reid, 195 Cal. 249 [36 A.L.R. 1345, 232 P. 457].)

The application for stay of execution is denied.


Summaries of

People v. Wallington

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Apr 7, 1926
77 Cal.App. 366 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)
Case details for

People v. Wallington

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. F. AMY WALLINGTON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 7, 1926

Citations

77 Cal.App. 366 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926)
246 P. 815

Citing Cases

People v. Schwarz

On April 7, 1926, and prior to the filing of any transcript on appeal, petitioner filed an application for…

People v. Egan

The motion involved in the instant appeal was not made until thirteen years after the entry of judgment at…