From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Waiters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 2, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of reckless manslaughter for stabbing the deceased in the heart with a kitchen knife. She called the police to the scene and, without being questioned, told the officers that the victim had been hitting her and that she had stabbed him in self-defense. When one of the officers asked her where the knife was, she pointed to it on a table. The officer's inquiry and his seizure of the knife were justifiable for safety reasons and did not violate the defendant's constitutional right against self-incrimination (see, New York v Quarles, 467 U.S. 649). Furthermore, her initial statements were spontaneous and entirely voluntary. The defendant's subsequent videotaped confession was made after she was fully informed of her rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436) and knowingly and intelligently waived them. The verdict was based on a reasonable view of the evidence.

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions, including the argument that her sentence was excessive, and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Waiters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Waiters

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARDINE WAITERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 414 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Jackson

We do not believe, however, that Quarles is limited to those situations since the Quarles opinion refers to…

People v. Smith

So, too, the People did not rely on, and likely would find no success in, arguing the public safety exception…