From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Waddy

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 28, 1970
25 Mich. App. 369 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Docket No. 7,087.

Decided July 28, 1970.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, Vincent J. Brennan, J. Submitted Division 1 May 11, 1970, at Detroit. (Docket No. 7,087.) Decided July 28, 1970.

John Waddy, Jr., was convicted of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. Defendant appeals. Remanded for evidentiary hearing.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Angelo A. Pentolino, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Michael D. Scallen, for defendant on appeal.

Before: R.B. BURNS, P.J., and LEVIN and CHURCHILL, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


Defendant and his codefendant, Randell Cope, were convicted by a jury of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. MCLA § 750.84 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.279).

While investigating the shooting of one Charlestta Henderson, police officers went to the apartment of Randell Cope and seized a revolver. The officers did not have a warrant for Cope's arrest nor a search warrant to search his apartment. Defense counsel moved to suppress the use of the revolver in evidence. Neither defendant was permitted to submit testimony at the hearing and the motion was denied. Although the defendants were jointly tried they have prosecuted separate appeals. People v. Cope, (1969), 18 Mich. App. 14, affirmed Cope's conviction, Judge LEVIN concurring in part and dissenting in part.

December 31, 1969, the Michigan Supreme Court entered an order as follows:

"On order of the Court, the application by defendant and appellant for leave to appeal is considered, and the same is Granted.

"The Court on its own motion orders the decision of the Court of Appeals reversed with remand by that Court to the Recorder's Court for the city of Detroit. The Recorder's Court will hold a complete evidentiary hearing on the admissibility of the gun. Upon such a hearing, if the gun is found to be inadmissible, the defendant would be entitled to a new trial. If the gun is properly found to be admissible, his conviction shall be deemed affirmed.

"This order entered December 31, 1969, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4)." See People v. Cope (1969), 383 Mich. 757.

McDonald v. United States (1948), 335 U.S. 451 ( 69 S Ct 191, 93 L Ed 153) held that in a joint trial of McDonald and Washington, evidence seized illegally in a room rented by McDonald could not be used against his codefendant Washington.

We remand the present case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing complying with the Supreme Court's order in People v. Cope, supra.

All concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Waddy

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 28, 1970
25 Mich. App. 369 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

People v. Waddy

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. WADDY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 28, 1970

Citations

25 Mich. App. 369 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
181 N.W.2d 607