From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vezequ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 4, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

109977

03-04-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mindy VEZEQU, Appellant.

Stephen W. Herrick, Public Defender, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.


Stephen W. Herrick, Public Defender, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Lynch, J.), rendered March 21, 2017, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was required to waive her right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to three years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel's brief, we disagree. There is at least one issue of arguable merit relating to County Court's failure to exercise its discretion concerning defendant's request for judicial diversion (see People v. Conley, 161 A.D.3d 1486, 1487, 77 N.Y.S.3d 772 [2018] ). Accordingly, without passing judgment on the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v. Beaty, 22 N.Y.3d 490, 492–493, 982 N.Y.S.2d 820, 5 N.E.3d 983 [2014] ; People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 638–639, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ; People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 980, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.


Summaries of

People v. Vezequ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 4, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Vezequ

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mindy Vezequ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 1194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1289
139 N.Y.S.3d 913

Citing Cases

People v. Vezequ

When defendant eventually appeared, County Court sentenced her, as a second felony offender, to three years…