From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 14, 1986
122 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

July 14, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.).


Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of robbery in the first degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment. As so modified, judgment affirmed.

The proof adduced against the defendant at trial consisted of his statements to two acquaintances that he robbed someone of about $7 and then stabbed the victim in the back. The victim's lifeless body was discovered later that same night, a relatively short distance from the place where the defendant told his story. An autopsy performed on the deceased revealed that he died as a result of a stab wound in his back.

Pursuant to CPL 60.50, a conviction may not be based solely on a defendant's admission or confession: the People must provide "additional proof that the offense charged has been committed". However, as the People readily concede, no evidence was presented to corroborate the defendant's admission that he relieved the deceased of about $7. Therefore, an element of the crime of robbery has not been established, to wit: a larcenous taking (see, People v Ruckdeschel, 51 A.D.2d 861). However, corroboration of felony murder was adduced as the People produced a corpus delicti, i.e., that the deceased was a victim of homicide resulting from someone's criminality (see, People v Lipsky, 57 N.Y.2d 560; People v Davis, 46 N.Y.2d 780; People v Murray, 40 N.Y.2d 327, cert denied 430 U.S. 948). Moreover, dismissal of the underlying felony count does not necessitate a similar result with respect to a conviction of felony murder (see, People v Murray, supra, at p 334; People v Dennis, 33 N.Y.2d 996, affg 40 A.D.2d 959; People v Wroblewski, 109 A.D.2d 39, 44, affd 67 N.Y.2d 933; People v Scott, 93 A.D.2d 754, 755).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for review or without merit. Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 14, 1986
122 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Velez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE VELEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 178 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Vargas

Although there were inconsistencies in this witness's testimony, they were not so significant as to render…

People v. Jackson

We note that a conviction of felony murder, although requiring corroboration of defendant's confession with…