Opinion
March 13, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank J. Blangiardo, J.).
In the early morning hours of October 18, 1985, defendant and an accomplice, Edwin Santana, sprayed Gregory Hill with a Mace-like substance and took $20 from him at knifepoint. Hill reported the robbery to the police, who apprehended defendant and Santana two blocks from the scene, and within minutes of the incident. A knife was recovered from defendant's waistband.
On appeal, defendant claims that he was deprived of his right to counsel when the trial court instructed the jury, on more than one occasion, to disregard the personal opinions and theories of the attorneys, as expressed during summations. While such comments are not proper (see, People v Reina, 94 A.D.2d 727), defendant did not preserve the claim for appellate review by timely objection (see, CPL 470.05; People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641) and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Milonas, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.