From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Usera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 28, 2021
198 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14505 Ind. No. 1001/18 Case No. 2019–774

10-28-2021

The PEOPLE of The State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven USERA, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Emilia King–Musza of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Meghan McLoughlin of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Emilia King–Musza of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Meghan McLoughlin of counsel), for respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gonza´lez, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham Clott, J.), rendered December 06, 2018,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Usera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 28, 2021
198 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Usera

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of The State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven USERA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 28, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
153 N.Y.S.3d 835

Citing Cases

People v. Usera

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 198 A.D.3d…

Hersko v. Hersko

Moreover, even assuming a reasonable excuse for the default in serving an answer was proffered, these…