From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Uraz

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 30, 2024
SC 165560 (Mich. Jan. 30, 2024)

Opinion

SC 165560 SC 165561(150) (152) COA 343695 343696

01-30-2024

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUNC URAZ, Defendant-Appellant.


Ingham CC: 16-001064-FH 16-001065-FC

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the motion to file a supplement is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2023 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay and hold in abeyance is DENIED.


Summaries of

People v. Uraz

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 30, 2024
SC 165560 (Mich. Jan. 30, 2024)
Case details for

People v. Uraz

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUNC URAZ…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 30, 2024

Citations

SC 165560 (Mich. Jan. 30, 2024)