From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tull

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2014
123 A.D.3d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-30

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Manuel TULL, Defendant–Appellant.

Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Seth Steed of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily L. Auletta of counsel), for respondent.


Scott A. Rosenberg, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Seth Steed of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily L. Auletta of counsel), for respondent.
ACOSTA, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, RICHTER, FEINMAN, CLARK, JJ.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered on or about January 29, 2013,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Tull

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2014
123 A.D.3d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Tull

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Manuel TULL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 9045
998 N.Y.S.2d 129