Opinion
No. 103191.
May 24, 1996.
Leave to Appeal Granted May 24, 1996:
The question is limited to whether the Legislature intended to require consecutive sentencing for a substantive drug law conviction and a conviction of conspiracy to commit that same drug law offense, where the two convictions arise from a single transaction. The case is to be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of People v Gilbert Banks, No. 101601.
Court of Appeals No. 151725.