Opinion
October 3, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's motion for a trial order of dismissal was not specific enough to preserve the issue of legal sufficiency for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245, 250). In any event, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), the circumstantial evidence of the defendant's guilt naturally flowed from the facts proved, was consistent with them, and excluded to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis of innocence (see, People v. Benzinger, 36 N.Y.2d 29, 32; People v. Tedesco, 143 A.D.2d 155). In addition, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
Further, under no reasonable view of the evidence could the jury find that the defendant would be able to establish an affirmative defense to the charge of felony murder under Penal Law § 125.25 (3). Therefore, the trial court did not err when it denied its request for such a charge (see, People v. Butts, 72 N.Y.2d 746).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.