From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Trala

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Apr 22, 2022
No. 2022-02664 (N.Y. App. Div. Apr. 22, 2022)

Opinion

2022-02664

04-22-2022

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES TRALA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered November 30, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (six counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of six counts of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), defendant contends that his plea was involuntarily entered because it was induced by a sentencing commitment from Supreme Court that could not legally be fulfilled. Because he did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review (see People v Bellamy, 170 A.D.3d 1652, 1653 [4th Dept 2019]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).

As defendant further contends, and the People correctly concede, his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because the court's "oral colloquy mischaracterized it as an absolute bar to the taking of an appeal" (People v McCrayer, 199 A.D.3d 1401, 1401 [4th Dept 2021]; see People v Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565 [2019], cert denied __ U.S. __, 140 S.Ct. 2634 [2020]). Nevertheless, we reject defendant's contentions that the court erred in refusing to suppress certain evidence as the fruit of an unlawful arrest and that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe.


Summaries of

People v. Trala

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Apr 22, 2022
No. 2022-02664 (N.Y. App. Div. Apr. 22, 2022)
Case details for

People v. Trala

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES TRALA…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 22, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-02664 (N.Y. App. Div. Apr. 22, 2022)