From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Torres

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 20, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7860 (N.Y. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-20

The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. Vincent TORRES, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1) The People, etc., Appellant, v. Vincent Torres, Respondent. (Appeal No. 2)

William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (Victoria M. White of counsel), for appellant in the first and second above-entitled actions. *475J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for respondent in the first and second above-entitled actions.


William J. Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Syracuse (Victoria M. White of counsel), for appellant in the first and second above-entitled actions. *475J. Scott Porter, Seneca Falls, for respondent in the first and second above-entitled actions.
MEMORANDUM:

The orders of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant adequately preserved the argument that the exclusion of his wife from the courtroom violated his right to a public trial ( see People v. Alvarez, 20 N.Y.3d 75, 81, 955 N.Y.S.2d 846, 979 N.E.2d 1173 [2012];see also People v. Caban, 14 N.Y.3d 369, 373, 901 N.Y.S.2d 566, 927 N.E.2d 1050 [2010] ). The closure of the courtroom during jury selection was not trivial ( see People v. Martin, 16 N.Y.3d 607, 613, 925 N.Y.S.2d 400, 949 N.E.2d 491 [2011] ). Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), orders affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Torres

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 20, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7860 (N.Y. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. Vincent TORRES, Respondent. (Appeal No. 1…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7860 (N.Y. 2012)
20 N.Y.3d 890
956 N.Y.S.2d 474
980 N.E.2d 523

Citing Cases

People v. Rush

Contrary to defendant's further contention, the photographic evidence taken at the ATM machine was relevant…

People v. Patterson

Thus, "[i]t is true that the defense lawyer[ ] never said on the record ‘we object to this [ruling],’ but…