From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tobo

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 24, 2020
184 A.D.3d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018–02557

06-24-2020

PEOPLE of State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis TOBO, Appellant.

Richard Cary Spivack, Forest Hills, NY, for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill, Joseph N. Ferdenzi, and Josette Simmons McGhee of counsel), for respondent.


Richard Cary Spivack, Forest Hills, NY, for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill, Joseph N. Ferdenzi, and Josette Simmons McGhee of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Michelle A. Johnson, J.), dated February 2, 2018. The order, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the third degree. After a hearing pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C [hereinafter SORA] ), the defendant was designated a level two sex offender. On appeal, the defendant challenges the assessment of 15 points under risk factor 11.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination to assess 15 points under risk factor 11. In order to support the assessment of points under risk factor 11, "the People must show by clear and convincing evidence that the offender used alcohol in excess either at the time of the crime or repeatedly in the past" ( People v. Palmer, 20 N.Y.3d 373, 378, 960 N.Y.S.2d 719, 984 N.E.2d 917 ; see SORA: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 15 [2006]; People v. Leon, 172 A.D.3d 765, 766, 97 N.Y.S.3d 497 ). Here, the assessment of these points was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. The case summary stated that, when interviewed for the presentence report, the defendant admitted that he was "drunk" at the time that he committed one of the instant crimes (see People v. Alvarado, 173 A.D.3d 909, 909–910, 100 N.Y.S.3d 351 ; People v. Rosario, 164 A.D.3d 625, 626, 81 N.Y.S.3d 566 ; People v. Villanueva, 143 A.D.3d 794, 38 N.Y.S.3d 805 ). In addition, the defendant scored in the "Problem Use" range on the Michigan Alcohol Screening Test and participated in an alcohol and substance abuse treatment program while incarcerated.

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tobo

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jun 24, 2020
184 A.D.3d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Tobo

Case Details

Full title:People of State of New York, respondent, v. Luis Tobo, appellant. Richard…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jun 24, 2020

Citations

184 A.D.3d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
124 N.Y.S.3d 232
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 3556

Citing Cases

People v. Bullock

The court also properly assessed the defendant 15 points under risk factor 11. The People established by…