From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tillery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1990
158 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 20, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Mollen, P.J., Brown, Kunzeman, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tillery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1990
158 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Tillery

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARVIN TILLERY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 602