From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tiffany

Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department
Dec 8, 1999
183 Misc. 2d 330 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)

Opinion

December 8, 1999

Kieran James Sullivan, White Plains, for appellant.

Jeanine Ferris Pirro, District Attorney of Westchester County, White Plains (Darcy P. Rydlun and Bruce Edward Kelly of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: INGRASSIA, J.P., PALELLA and LEVITT, JJ.


DECIDED

MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and accusatory instrument dismissed.

The factual allegations set forth in the accusatory instrument fail to establish, if believed, that the defendant acted with the requisite intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm or that he recklessly created a risk thereof (Penal Law § 240.20). The defendant was merely stating his views on the state of the local police department and the instrument indicates that the only effect of his actions was to cause people to leave the area. Entirely absent is any basis upon which to conclude that a breach of the peace was intended or at risk (see, People Mehdi, 29 N.Y.2d 824; cf., People v. Tichenor, 89 N.Y.2d 769)

We note that an adjudication of criminal contempt pursuant to section 750 Jud. of the Judiciary Law is in the nature of a special civil proceeding and is therefore not appealable as part of a judgment of conviction.


Summaries of

People v. Tiffany

Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department
Dec 8, 1999
183 Misc. 2d 330 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)
Case details for

People v. Tiffany

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLAYTON TIFFANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1999

Citations

183 Misc. 2d 330 (N.Y. App. Term 1999)
705 N.Y.S.2d 487