From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thornton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1998
250 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 7, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


Since defendant has not raised his claim of ineffective assistance in a CPL article 440 motion, the record is insufficient to review strategic explanations for counsel's conduct of the trial and failure to pursue an entrapment defense (see, People v. Love, 57 N.Y.2d 998; People v. Fuentes, 246 A.D.2d 474). A review of the existing record indicates that defendant received adequate representation (see, People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137; cf., People v. Brown, 82 N.Y.2d 869).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Thornton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1998
250 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Thornton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CRAIG THORNTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 654

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. Lord

"); People v. Arroyo, 678 N.Y.S.2d 722 (1st Dep't Oct. 6, 1998), ("Defendant, by failing to make a CPL 440.10…