Opinion
June 22, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mastro, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the prosecutor's cross-examination of him as to his failure to provide certain exculpatory information upon his arrest is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953), and in any event, without merit ( see, People v. Savage, 50 N.Y.2d 673, cert denied 449 U.S. 1016; People v. Blacks, 221 A.D.2d 351; People v. Spinelli, 214 A.D.2d 135).
The defendant's sentence was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.