From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. the Brooklyn Cooperage Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1912
98 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued February 26, 1912

Decided March 19, 1912

D-Cady Herrick and James M. Beck for appellant.

Thomas Carmody, Attorney-General ( John G. Agar, James F. Tracey and J.A. Kellogg of counsel), for respondent.

Edward W. Hatch and Mynderse Van Cleef for Cornell University, defendant.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of our former decision in this case ( 187 N.Y. 142).

Concur: GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER and CHASE, JJ. WILLARD BARTLETT, J., votes for modification in accordance with the dissenting opinion of KELLOGG, J., below. Dissenting: CULLEN, Ch. J., and COLLIN, J.


Summaries of

People v. the Brooklyn Cooperage Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1912
98 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

People v. the Brooklyn Cooperage Company

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . THE BROOKLYN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1912

Citations

98 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1912)
98 N.E. 1110

Citing Cases

Neddo v. State of New York

Liability of the State arising from contractual relations depends on the express statutory authority of the…