From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 2, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Kennedy, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that a reversal is required because pretrial publicity deprived him of a fair trial (see, People v Pepper, 59 N.Y.2d 353). Defendant's claim that it was reversible error to deny his request for public funds to conduct a survey for the purpose of making an application for a change of venue is without merit. Defendant failed to demonstrate that an impartial jury could not be impaneled (see, CPL 230.20; 255.20 [3]; People v. Parker, 60 N.Y.2d 714; People v. DiPiazza, 24 N.Y.2d 342; People v. Simmons, 132 A.D.2d 1009). We have reviewed defendant's remaining claims and find them lacking in merit.


Summaries of

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER R. TAYLOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 92

Citing Cases

People v. Hill

Defendant further contends that reversal is required because pretrial publicity deprived him of a fair trial.…

People v. Hill

Defendant further contends that reversal is required because pretrial publicity deprived him of a fair trial.…