From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tarver

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2017
149 A.D.3d 1350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

107045.

04-20-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert TARVER, Appellant.

Kelly M. Monroe, Albany, for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark of counsel), for respondent.


Kelly M. Monroe, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (McDonough, J.), rendered July 29, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.Defendant pleaded guilty to the single-count indictment charging him with burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant was sentenced to seven years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, solely contending that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive.

Contrary to the People's assertion, it was improper for County Court to require defendant to waive his right to appeal, as the record establishes that "there was no promise, plea agreement, reduced charge, or any other bargain or consideration given to ... defendant in exchange for his plea" (People v. Nicelli, 74 A.D.3d 1235, 1236–1237, 904 N.Y.S.2d 119 [2010] ; see People v. Crump, 107 A.D.3d 1046, 1047, 966 N.Y.S.2d 282 [2013], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 1014, 971 N.Y.S.2d 497, 994 N.E.2d 393 [2013] ). As such, defendant's challenge to the sentence is not precluded. Nevertheless, we are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. The record reflects that County Court considered appropriate factors in rendering the sentence and the sentence was within the permissible statutory range (see Penal Law § 70.02[1][b] ; [3][b] ). As we find no abuse of discretion by the court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence imposed, it will not be disturbed (see People v. Crump, 107 A.D.3d at 1047, 966 N.Y.S.2d 282 ).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, EGAN JR., CLARK and AARONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tarver

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2017
149 A.D.3d 1350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Tarver

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT TARVER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 20, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 1350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
149 A.D.3d 1350
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3079

Citing Cases

People v. Strong

of violence, his cooperation with authorities, his familial history and his expressed remorse for his conduct…