From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Swain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 01-01183

October 2, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of Erie County Court (McCarthy, J.), entered April 27, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of welfare fraud in the fifth degree.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KRISTIN M. PREVE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK J. CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MARCY H. HAGEN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, GORSKI, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by providing that the amount of restitution to be paid by defendant is $825.24 and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of welfare fraud in the fifth degree (Penal Law 158.05) and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (175.35), based on his having failed to report that he had received unemployment insurance benefits when he applied for re-certification of public assistance benefits on December 3, 1999. Contrary to defendant's contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence, despite the absence of direct proof of defendant's intent to defraud. Defendant's intent may be readily inferred "from defendant's conduct and the surrounding circumstances" ( People v. Snyder, 306 A.D.2d 949, 949; see generally People v. Gianni, 303 A.D.2d 1012). County Court erred, however, in ordering defendant to pay restitution in the amount of $1,000. Defendant was convicted of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree based on his application for re-certification of public assistance benefits on December 3, 1999, and the total amount of the public assistance benefits received by defendant after that date is $825.24. We therefore modify the judgment by providing that the amount of restitution to be paid by defendant is $825.24.


Summaries of

People v. Swain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Swain

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KELVIN SWAIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1173 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 896

Citing Cases

People v. Rafferty

In addition, we conclude that the evidence before the grand jury, viewed in the light most favorable to the…

People v. Rafferty

e County's permit issued by the State, was "not acting as a private concern" but rather was exercising a…