Summary
granting review of Court of Appeal decision interpreting "provide" for purposes of meal and rest periods
Summary of this case from Wong v. HSBC Mortg. Corp. (Usa)Opinion
Page __
__ Cal.4th __ 196 P.3d 216, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 689 PEOPLE v. SUTTON (Michael Jerome). No. S166402 Supreme Court of California October 28, 2008Prior Report: __ Cal.App. __, 81 Cal.Rptr.3d 195.
OPINION
Petition for review granted; issues limited (criminal case).
The petitions for review are granted.
The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Were defendants’ statutory speedy trial rights violated when defense counsel announced ready but that he might be in another trial, and the court continued trial for six days over defendants’ personal objection, and if so, was the error prejudicial?
[196 P.3d 217] GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.