From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sumpter

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Nov 14, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 51636 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

571135/15

11-14-2016

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Romel Sumpter, Defendant-Appellant.


PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Gonzalez, JJ.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered November 3, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of theft of services, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered November 3, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, n 1 [2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT. I concurI concurI concur Decision Date: November 14, 2016


Summaries of

People v. Sumpter

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Nov 14, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 51636 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

People v. Sumpter

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Romel Sumpter…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Nov 14, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 51636 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
48 N.Y.S.3d 267