From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sumahit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 2010
72 A.D.3d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2008-11239.

April 20, 2010.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered November 6, 2008, convicting him of gang assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea, his contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Antoine, 59 AD3d 560; People v Castillo-Cordero, 54 AD3d 1054; People v Bevins, 27 AD3d 572; People v Martin, 7 AD3d 640). In any event, his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered ( see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910-911; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert denied 393 US 1067).

To the extent that the defendant's contentions regarding any alleged ineffective assistance of counsel rest on matter outside the record, they are not reviewable on direct appeal ( see People v Ali, 55 AD3d 919; People v Drago, 50 AD3d 920). Insofar as the contentions are reviewable, we find that the defendant received meaningful representation ( see People v Drago, 50 AD3d 920; People v Brooks, 36 AD3d 929, 930; People v Grimes, 35 AD3d 882, 883).

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive ( see People v De Alvarez, 59 AD3d 732; People v Fanelli, 8 AD3d 296; People v Mejia, 6 AD3d 630, 631; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816. In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Sumahit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 2010
72 A.D.3d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Sumahit

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDREW SUMAHIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3357
898 N.Y.S.2d 510

Citing Cases

People v. Vincent

Thus, the defendant failed to rebut the presumption that he possessed the loaded firearm with the intent to…

People v. Steven

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's claims that he was deprived of effective assistance of…