From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Suarez

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 940 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1982

Decided February 11, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN J. CLYNE, J.

Marshall Nadan for appellant.

Michael Kavanaugh, District Attorney ( Susan Shaw of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's contention that his rights under CPL 30.30 were violated was forfeited when he entered his plea of guilty ( People v Friscia, 51 N.Y.2d 845). In addition, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, we find there was no violation of defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial (see People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442).

Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum; Chief Judge COOKE and Judge JONES taking no part.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Suarez

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 11, 1982
55 N.Y.2d 940 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Suarez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ENRIQUE SUAREZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 11, 1982

Citations

55 N.Y.2d 940 (N.Y. 1982)
449 N.Y.S.2d 176
434 N.E.2d 245

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Although neither the defendant, defense counsel, the prosecutor, nor the Supreme Court expressly stated that…

People v. Hernandez

The court advised the defendant that he was retaining his right to appeal any rulings of the court. A…