From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Strick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1965
204 N.E.2d 335 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Submitted October 14, 1964

Decided January 7, 1965

Appeal from the Suffolk County Court, ALFRED S. KOFFLER, J.P.

Benjamin Greshin for appellant.

Bernard C. Smith, District Attorney ( Charles T. Matthews of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed in a memorandum. Since defendant was on trial for a misdemeanor, his absence from the courtroom could not have been in and of itself basis for declaring a mistrial (Code Crim. Pro., § 356) but, under the peculiar circumstances of this case, in which identification of defendant was critical and his absence from the courtroom may well have been contrived for purposes of appeal, the Trial Judge was privileged, in the exercise of sound discretion, to grant a mistrial over the objection of defense counsel.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

People v. Strick

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1965
204 N.E.2d 335 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

People v. Strick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT ELMER STRICK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 7, 1965

Citations

204 N.E.2d 335 (N.Y. 1965)
204 N.E.2d 335
256 N.Y.S.2d 137

Citing Cases

People v. Mallette

It is well established that in order to avoid the preclusion of double jeopardy where the People request a…

People v. Gentile

The prosecutor, by virtue of the actions of the defendants, had the right to call defendants' attorneys as…