From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stoughtenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 3, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his convictions for burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree were against the weight of the evidence. From our review of the testimony, we conclude that the trier of fact properly gave the evidence the weight it should be accorded in reaching its verdict (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).

Defendant further asserts that reversal is required because of prosecutorial misconduct. Since no objections were made to the alleged improprieties, this issue has not been preserved for our review (CPL 470.05; People v Dawson, 50 N.Y.2d 311, 324). We decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Stoughtenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1989
147 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Stoughtenger

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)