From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stewart

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

No. 818 KA 18-02220

11-10-2022

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY STEWART, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JILL L. PAPERNO, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


JILL L. PAPERNO, ACTING PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (SCOTT MYLES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Stephen T. Miller, A.J.), rendered August 2, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]), defendant contends that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe and that the waiver of the right to appeal does not foreclose his challenge to the severity of his sentence. As the People correctly concede, defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal "because County Court's oral colloquy utterly mischaracterized the nature of the right to appeal..., inasmuch as the court's advisement as to the rights relinquished [and retained by defendant] was incorrect and irredeemable under the circumstances" (People v Carter, 200 A.D.3d 1719, 1719 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 949 [2022] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 562, 565-566 [2019], cert denied - U.S. -, 140 S.Ct. 2634 [2020]; People v Crogan, 181 A.D.3d 1212, 1212 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1026 [2020]). We nevertheless perceive no basis in the record for the exercise of our authority to reduce the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).


Summaries of

People v. Stewart

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY STEWART…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)