From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 11, 1990

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Egan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the admission of hearsay evidence that impermissibly bolstered the victim's testimony. He asserts six instances of alleged improper bolstering, four of which are unpreserved for our review. We decline to exercise our power to review the unpreserved claims in the interest of justice. Insofar as the alleged errors are preserved, the admission of bolstering testimony must be deemed harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; see also, People v. Johnson, 57 N.Y.2d 969, 970; People v. Barnes, 144 A.D.2d 995, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 889; People v. Harper, 144 A.D.2d 946, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 892). The identification testimony of Officer Blair and Investigator Fantanza did not prejudice defendant because his identity was not an issue in this case (cf., People v. Felder, 108 A.D.2d 869, 870). In view of our determination, the argument that unrelated judgments must be vacated (see, People v. Fuggazzatto, 62 N.Y.2d 862) is rendered moot. In any event, those judgments are not before us.

Finally, the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GREGORY STANLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

People v. Travis

hose rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty," and that the valid waiver of the right to appeal…

People v. Travis

tention, and we conclude that the "[c]ourt's plea colloquy, together with the written waiver of the right to…