Opinion
May 31, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the trial court's charge on the issue of identification is not preserved for appellate review since no exception was taken to the court's charge (see, CPL 470.05; People v Stokes, 162 A.D.2d 737, 738; People v Wynn, 108 A.D.2d 768) and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to reach the issue. Brown, J.P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.