From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Southerland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1988
136 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 19, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Brennan, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

No hearing has been held because the defendant cannot be located. It appears that the defendant is not currently incarcerated or under parole supervision.

We agree with the report of the hearing court (Linakis, J.) that diligent efforts to locate the defendant have been made. All such efforts have been unsuccessful.

The effect of the defendant's unexplained absence is that he is not available to obey the mandate of the court (cf., People v Howe, 32 N.Y.2d 766; People v Jimenez, 97 A.D.2d 799). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Southerland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1988
136 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Southerland

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH SOUTHERLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Peppin v. Lewis

The Appellate Division is similarly quite laconic in this area, issuing essentially one sentence opinions.…

People v. Wright

The defendant was under no obligation to remain in contact with law enforcement officials. We find that the…