From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 18, 2000

February 28, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered September 14, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Thomas S. Burka of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded there was no Rosario violation (see, CPL 240.45[1][a];People v. Banch, 80 N.Y.2d 610 ; People v. Ranghelle, 69 N.Y.2d 56 ;People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866).


Summaries of

People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. PITO SOTO, appellant. (Ind. No. 5587/98)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 830