From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sobchik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1985
108 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 4, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).


Judgments affirmed.

Criminal Term did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's application to withdraw his pleas of guilty. Under the circumstances of this case, defendant's belated claims of innocence coupled with a lack of prejudice to the People do not mandate a grant of such an application ( see, People v Silipo, 59 A.D.2d 807).

Defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution and his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel have not been preserved for review on this record ( see, People v Ramos, 63 N.Y.2d 640; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Guerra, 99 A.D.2d 787).

Finally, we conclude that the sentences imposed were not excessive. Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Sobchik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1985
108 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Sobchik

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY SOBCHIK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Martinez

It has been held that a defendant's belated claim of innocence is not a sufficient legal ground upon which to…

People v. Baldwin

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily and…