From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Snyder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-06550.

Decided May 24, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), imposed June 26, 2002, upon his conviction of assault in the second degree.

Sally Wasserman, New York, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Shlom J. Twersky of counsel; Robert W. Ho on the brief), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.,


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw is granted ( see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief, and, in any event, the issues raised are not properly before this court.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Snyder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CARL SNYDER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 862

Citing Cases

Snyder v. Smith

The Appellate Division correctly determined both that these issues were not even properly before it, and that…