From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sneed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 12, 1993

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Egan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant's contention that his statement should have been suppressed based on a violation of Payton v. New York ( 445 U.S. 573) was not raised before the suppression court and is unpreserved for our review (see, People v. Martin, 50 N.Y.2d 1029). We decline to reach that issue in the interest of justice. We modify, however, to provide that all sentences run concurrently (see, CPL 470.15 [b]).


Summaries of

People v. Sneed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Sneed

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OSCAR L. SNEED, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

People v. Britton

MEMORANDUM: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia,…