From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1991
176 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 24, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.).


While walking on 42nd Street in Manhattan in the early morning hours, complainant was approached by defendant, who ripped a chain and medallion from complainant's neck. Complainant grabbed at defendant's hands and was able to retrieve the jewelry as the police were arriving.

At trial, defense counsel moved to have attempted robbery charged as a lesser included offense. The trial court denied the motion, stating that no reasonable view of the evidence would support a conviction for attempted robbery and not for completed robbery. We agree. Despite the fact that the complainant eventually recovered his property, the taking element of larceny was satisfied. (Harrison v. People, 50 N.Y. 518.) No reasonable view of the evidence would support a finding of guilt on an attempted robbery charge and not on a completed robbery charge. (See, CPL 300.50.)

As respondent concedes, since defendant was found guilty and convicted of second degree robbery, his conviction of the lesser included offense of third degree robbery should be vacated. (CPL 300.40 [b].)

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 24, 1991
176 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY SMITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 185 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 309

Citing Cases

People v. Davis

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence.…