From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

December 21, 1964


The letter, dated October 19, 1964, from the appellant addressed to Honorable MARCUS G. CHRIST, Associate Justice of this court, will be treated as a motion to vacate this court's order of September 24, 1960 dismissing the appeal and to reinstate the appeal. The appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 28, 1960. The motion is denied. The appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant now claims he was unaware of the fact that his retained attorney had neglected to prosecute the appeal and had withdrawn from the case. Such lack of personal knowledge by the appellant is not sufficient ground to vacate the dismissal of the appeal caused by the negligence of his attorney, whether such attorney be one retained by appellant (as in this case) or assigned by the court ( People v. Kling, 14 N.Y.2d 571, affg. 19 A.D.2d 750; People v. Marchese, 14 N.Y.2d 695, affg. 19 A.D.2d 728). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEON SMITH, Also Known…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

People v. Weeks

In our opinion, the proof amply supports this finding. In any event, even if counsel had promised and…

People v. Starkins

Of course, if the plenary proof should disclose that the defendant's attorneys, in good faith, intentionally…