From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 1998
253 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 22, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Beal, J.)


The court properly denied defendant's meritless motion to withdraw his guilty plea, after sufficient inquiry. Defendant's conclusory allegation at sentencing that his assigned counsel had coerced him into pleading guilty, which was briefly explored by the court, did not provide a basis for withdrawal of his plea. Appointment of new counsel was not required. Defense counsel did not become a witness against her client by merely responding to the court's minimal inquiry ( compare, People v. Ferrer, 158 A.D.2d 315, with People v. Santana, 156 A.D.2d 736, 737) and the record establishes that the court's rejection of defendant's claim of coercion was not based on any statements by defense counsel ( see, People v. Rodriguez, 189 A.D.2d 684, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 892).

Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 1998
253 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEO SMITH, Also Known…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 464

Citing Cases

People v. Soles

The sentencing court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's application to withdraw his…

People v. Rivera

After sufficient inquiry, the court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea, without a…