Opinion
May 15, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that certain of the prosecutor's statements during summation constituted reversible error is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641; People v Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818; People v Long, 205 A.D.2d 804; People v Foster, 100 A.D.2d 200), and we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.