Opinion
December 24, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his judgment of conviction should be reversed because the testimony of the People's leading witness was acquired by duress. We disagree. While the issue is preserved for appellate review even though there was no objection until the close of the testimony (see, CPL 470.05; cf., People v. Butchino, 141 A.D.2d 986; People v. Vasquez, 114 A.D.2d 589, 590), it is lacking in merit. The witness was extensively cross-examined about the alleged police coercion, making the jury fully aware of any weaknesses in his testimony (see, People v. Reid, 69 N.Y.2d 469, 477). "Thus, the requirements of law were met because `the fact of such [alleged] earlier coercion or other official lawlessness [was] disclosed to the jurors so that they [could] pass upon the witness' veracity and credibility and determine whether the testimony given in open court was truthful and worthy of consideration'" (People v. Reid, supra, at 477, quoting from People v. Portelli, 15 N.Y.2d 235, 239, cert. denied 382 U.S. 1009).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Harwood, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.