From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Skipwith

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 11, 2016
139 A.D.3d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

05-11-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Justin L. SKIPWITH, appellant.

Thomas N.N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.


Thomas N.N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hubert, J.), imposed September 17, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., DILLON, SGROI, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Skipwith

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 11, 2016
139 A.D.3d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Skipwith

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Justin L. SKIPWITH, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 11, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 884 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3764
29 N.Y.S.3d 822