From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2004
5 A.D.3d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-08682.

Decided March 1, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered September 9, 2002, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Russell C. Morea, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Adam S. Charnoff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the People failed to timely turn over an audiotape of a pertinent 911 telephone call pursuant to Brady v. Maryland ( 373 U.S. 83) is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, since the defendant knew of the evidence and its exculpatory nature well in advance of trial ( see People v. Doshi, 93 N.Y.2d 499), it was not Brady material ( see People v. Rodriguez, 223 A.D.2d 605, 606; People v. Banks, 130 A.D.2d 498, 499).

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Singh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2004
5 A.D.3d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. SHAILESH SINGH, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

People v. McClain

Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no Brady violation ( see Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83) in…

People v. Redding

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he has not demonstrated that his trial counsel was ineffective under…