From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simmons

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District
Feb 22, 1974
308 N.E.2d 859 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)

Summary

In Simmons, the court did not read the charge to the defendant, nor was he asked if he understood the nature of the charges.

Summary of this case from People v. McCarty

Opinion

No. 72-278 Reversed and remanded.

February 22, 1974.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. HAROLD O. FARMER, Judge, presiding.

Robert E. Farrell, Deputy Defender, of Mt. Vernon (J. Earl Crisel, of counsel), for appellant.

Robert H. Rice, State's Attorney, of Belleville, for the People.


Appellant was convicted of five counts of armed robbery upon his negotiated plea of guilty in St. Clair County. He asserts here that the trial court did not properly accept his guilty plea, that the court improperly imposed separate concurrent sentences for each of the five counts, and that the sentences were excessive.

• 1, 2 While appellant was informed that he was charged with armed robbery, he was at no time given any explanation of the nature of the charge. The indictment was not read to him nor were the elements of the charge explained to him. He was never asked if he understood the nature of the charge. This Court has clearly held such failure to be reversible error ( People v. Hudson, 7 Ill. App.3d 800, 288 N.E.2d 533; People v. Ingeneri, 7 Ill. App.3d 809, 288 N.E.2d 550). While it is true as the State noted that his plea was accepted prior to the decisions noted, it is inescapable that such a complete failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 402(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 110A, par. 402(a)) requires reversal. The court further failed to comply with Rule 402(b) in not confirming with the defendant terms of the plea agreement entered into on the record in open court. The combination of these errors require that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded with direction to allow appellant to plead anew if he so desires.

Because of the clear error in acceptance of the guilty plea, we deem it unnecessary to consider the other issues raised on appeal.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Mr. JUSTICE CARTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

People v. Simmons

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District
Feb 22, 1974
308 N.E.2d 859 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)

In Simmons, the court did not read the charge to the defendant, nor was he asked if he understood the nature of the charges.

Summary of this case from People v. McCarty
Case details for

People v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RALPH LEON…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 22, 1974

Citations

308 N.E.2d 859 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
308 N.E.2d 859

Citing Cases

People v. McCarty

The defendant knew the charges against him, that they were Class 4 felonies, and that he could be sentenced…