From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On April 25, 1990, at approximately 8:00 P.M. the defendant; her husband, Anthony Simmons; and Michael Alexander were arrested by police officers who executed a search warrant for a second-floor apartment at 579 Wyona Street in Brooklyn where they found a narcotics factory. The police seized over six pounds of cocaine, six weapons, hundreds of rounds of ammunition, more than $55,000 in cash, a large quantity of jewelry, and assorted drug paraphernalia, including scales and heat-sealing machines. The police found the defendant in the rear bedroom standing near a gun in plain view and found a substantial quantity of narcotics in the room.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly permitted the People to amend the indictment to reflect that the conspiracy commenced in October of 1987 rather than on April 25, 1990, the date the search warrant for the defendant's apartment at 579 Wyona Street was executed. The amendment of the date on which the conspiracy began was proper since it did not change the theory of the prosecution or otherwise prejudice the defendant on the merits. The overt acts, which spanned a period from October of 1987 to March 1990 and upon which the People based their case, were set forth in the original indictment, affording the defendant fair notice of the drug transactions which the People would attempt to prove (see, CPL 200.70; People v. Hood, 194 A.D.2d 556).

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

Furthermore, the sentence imposed was not excessive in light of the evidence adduced at trial (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

We find the defendant's remaining contentions to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NADINE SIMMONS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 751

Citing Cases

People v. Kent

The trial court may "order the amendment of an indictment with respect to defects, errors or variances from…

People v. Sommer

The amendment was proper since it did not change the theory of the prosecution or otherwise prejudice the…