From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shears

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1992
184 A.D.2d 357 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 18, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.).


Defendant's argument that the prosecutor's summation deprived him of a fair trial is, for the most part, unpreserved and we decline to review it (CPL 470.05). Were we to review in the interest of justice, we would find that the challenged comments do not warrant a new trial in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, and in light of the defense summation. We have recently expressed disapproval of comments comparing the defense to a magician performing magic tricks (People v. Torres, 171 A.D.2d 425, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 1001), and we would also remind prosecutors that they should avoid improper arguments suggesting that a witness testified in order to gain the jury's sympathy (People v. Rivera, 116 A.D.2d 371, 375).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Shears

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1992
184 A.D.2d 357 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Shears

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEON SHEARS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 357 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Blanco

Defendant has also failed to preserve for appellate review his contentions with respect to the prosecutor's…