From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schulman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

April, 1926.


Order of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Appellate Part, reversed upon the law and defendant remanded to the New York City Reformatory, as directed by the magistrate. The defendant was charged with being a vagrant and upon arraignment before a city magistrate pleaded guilty. He was thereupon sentenced to confinement in the New York City Reformatory "according to law," pursuant to the provisions of section 93 of the Inferior Criminal Courts Act. The Court of Special Sessions entertained an appeal from this judgment of conviction and reversed "on the law and the facts" and directed "a new trial." There was nothing before that court upon which such determination could legally be based. The defendant upon being arraigned made no demand for proof but simply interposed a plea of guilty. Such a plea is a confession of guilt and the equivalent of a valid conviction. We are of the opinion that there was no power to reverse the magistrate's judgment. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

See Laws of 1910, chap. 659, § 93. — [REP.


Summaries of

People v. Schulman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

People v. Schulman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. SAMUEL SCHULMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1926

Citations

216 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

State v. Stevens

To the same effect is 19 Pi. and Pr. 505, and 17 C. J. 32. Among the authorities sustaining this construction…

State ex rel. Geschwender v. La Rowe

Geschwender's counsel was correct when he advised his client that, under the facts which here obtain,…