From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Schaurer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 22, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

KA 05-01446.

September 22, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Ronald A. Cicoria, J.), rendered May 3, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree.

E. ROBERT FUSSELL, P.C., LEROY (E. ROBERT FUSSELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THOMAS E. MORAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (ERIC R. SCHIENER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.43). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution with respect to the weight of the cocaine he sold ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Perry, 21 AD3d 1352, lv denied 5 NY3d 884 [2005]). Likewise, defendant's challenge to the constitutionality of Penal Law § 220.43 has not been preserved for our review ( see People v Baumann Sons Buses, Inc., 6 NY3d 404, 408, rearg denied 7 NY3d 742; People v Davidson, 98 NY2d 738, 739-740), nor was the requisite notice given to the Attorney General ( see Executive Law § 71; People v McKeehan, 2 AD3d 1421, 1422, lv denied 3 NY3d 644).


Summaries of

People v. Schaurer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 22, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Schaurer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PAUL SCHAURER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 22, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 1241 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6729
820 N.Y.S.2d 827

Citing Cases

Lawrence v. Graham

Lawrence argues that the jury likewise should have been instructed that it needed to adjudicate the…

People v. Woodard

Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime of burglary in the first degree as charged to the…